Published Mar 26, 2024
com.atlassian.confluence.content.render.xhtml.migration.exceptions.UnknownMacroMigrationException: The macro 'datalayer.push(arguments);' is unknown.
5.2.9 Assessing certainty or confidence in the evidence
Further consideration is required to assess the certainty of the evidence, or confidence in the final synthesized finding being used to make recommendations for clinical practice and policy. For systematic reviews of textual evidence, the GRADE approach7 (assessing certainty) or the ConQual approach44 (assessing confidence), presented in a ‘Summary of Findings’ table may not be appropriate, especially when the certainty of the evidence is very low to begin with.
It may be more appropriate to consider issuing a recommendation as a Good Practice Statement (GPS), that is clearly articulated as separate to GRADEd recommendations.45 The JBI Textual Evidence methodology group is planning to do some ongoing work in this area.
Related content
3.3.15 Assessment of confidence of qualitative synthesised findings
3.3.15 Assessment of confidence of qualitative synthesised findings
More like this
5. Systematic reviews of textual evidence: narrative, expert opinion or policy
5. Systematic reviews of textual evidence: narrative, expert opinion or policy
More like this
2.4.1 An Introduction to Evidence Synthesis Searching
2.4.1 An Introduction to Evidence Synthesis Searching
More like this
3.3.7 Determining the review question
3.3.7 Determining the review question
More like this
Systematic Reviews of Textual Evidence Resources
Systematic Reviews of Textual Evidence Resources
More like this
1.6 Reporting and conduct standards
1.6 Reporting and conduct standards
More like this