10. Scoping reviews
Danielle Pollock, Micah DJ Peters, Andrea C Tricco, Zachary Munn, Romy Menghao Jia, Lyndsay Alexander, Dawid Pieper, Catrin Evans, Christina M Godfrey, Érica Brandão de Moraes, Ashrita Saran, Fiona Campbell, Hanan Khalil
How to cite
Pollock D, Peters M, Tricco A, Munn Z, Jia R, Alexander L, Pieper D, Evans C, Godfrey C, Brandão de Moraes E, Saran A, Campbell F, Khalil H 20XX, ‘Scoping reviews’, in E Aromataris, C Lockwood, K Porritt, B Pilla, Z Jordan (eds), JBI manual for evidence synthesis, JBI, Adelaide, DOI:10.46658/JBIMES-24-06.
Acknowledgements
We recognise Dr Patricia McInerney, who contributed for many years to the JBI methodology for conducting scoping reviews.
Funding Declarations
ACT: Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Synthesis for Knowledge Users
ZM: National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Investigator Grant 1195676.
Contents
- 10.1 Introduction to Scoping reviews
- 10.2 How to conduct a scoping review
- 10.2.1 Team and resources needed for a JBI scoping review
- 10.2.2 Developing your protocol
- 10.2.3 Defining and aligning the objective/s and question/s
- 10.2.4 Developing and aligning the eligibility criteria with the objective/s and question/s
- 10.2.5 Describing the planned approach to evidence searching, selection, extraction and presentation
- 10.2.6 Searching for the evidence
- 10.2.7 Selecting the evidence
- 10.2.8 Critical appraisal or risk-of-bias assessment
- 10.2.9 Extracting the evidence
- 10.2.10 Analysing the evidence
- 10.2.11 Presentation of the results
- 10.2.12 Summarising the evidence
- 10.3 Reporting considerations
- 10.4 Updating scoping reviews
- 10.5 Challenges and potential solutions
- 10.6 Future directions of scoping reviews
- 10.7 Chapter References