Mixed Methods Resources
Digital Resources
When and how to use data transformation in mixed methods systematic reviews | The second part in a 3-part mixed methods systematic review series | The third part of a 3-part mixed methods systematic review series | An excerpt from the JBI LIVE webinar, ‘The JBI Approach to Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews’ |
An excerpt from the JBI LIVE webinar, ‘The JBI Approach to Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews’ | An excerpt from the JBI LIVE webinar, ‘The JBI Approach to Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews’ | An overview of the JBI approach to mixed methods systematic reviews, with practical considerations for people conducting their own mixed methods systematic reviews, or for those who use them.  | A short podcast |
Publications
Five common pitfalls in mixed methods systematic reviews: lessons learned Lizarondo, L et al 2022 Common pitfalls in conducting a mixed methods systematic review relate to the justification for undertaking a mixed methods approach to the systematic review, mismatch between the review questions and the synthesis/integration approach used, inadvertent or deliberate exclusion of mixed methods primary research in the review, lack of clarity about data transformation, and the lack of integration of the quantitative and qualitative components of the review. | Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews Stern, C et al 2020 This paper outlines the updated methodological approach for conducting a JBI mixed methods systematic review with a focus on data synthesis; specifically, methods related to how data are combined and the overall integration of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. | Â |