<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-Y0S42W4GLW"></script>
<script>
window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
function gtag()

Unknown macro: {dataLayer.push(arguments);}

gtag('js', new Date());

gtag('config', 'G-Y0S42W4GLW');
</script>

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »


Presentation of the results may map out the reviewed material in logical, diagrammatic or tabular form, and/or in a descriptive format that aligns specifically with the objective and scope of the review. The tables and charts may show results as: distribution of sources by year or period of publication (depends on each case), countries of origin, area of intervention (clinical, policy, educational, etc.), and research methods.

Figure 11.5: Flow diagram for the scoping review process adapted from the PRISMA statement by Moher and colleagues (2009)


  • No labels