2.2 Synthesis Prioritization

JBI encourages authors to consider both local and global priorities when determining knowledge needs for evidence syntheses. Typically, local priorities are more frequently addressed and are determined in collaboration with policymakers, health services and knowledge users. As per the https://jbi.global/jbi-model-of-EBHC , it is asserted that this context-driven approach is more likely to result in successful implementation and sustainable impact. 

However, we also encourage authors to consider alignment with global priorities such as the https://sdgs.un.org/goals (SDGs) as part of their topic prioritization process. It is incumbent all of those who contribute to the global evidence ecosystem to avoid duplication of effort and research waste, to address global health challenges and to advance global health outcomes, which form a critical part of our vision and mission; we encourage authors to embrace similar values towards the conduct of their work.  Further information regarding the role of evidence syntheses in addressing SDGs can be located here: https://www.sdgsynthesiscoalition.org/