<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-Y0S42W4GLW"></script>
<script>
window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
function gtag()

Unknown macro: {dataLayer.push(arguments);}

gtag('js', new Date());

gtag('config', 'G-Y0S42W4GLW');
</script>

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Current »

Digital Resources

qualitative-evidence-synthesis-teaser.jpg

What is qualitative evidence synthesis?  

In this short video Prof Catrin Evans explains what is a qualitative systematic review and the value of this type of evidence synthesis.

health-inequalities-qualitative-teaser.jpg

Equity, Diversity and Inclusion within the Qualitative Systematic Review Process

Prof Catrin Evans presents at JBI iGNITE on methods and approaches for attending to equity, diversity and inclusion within the qualitative systematic review process.

qualitative-systematic-reviews-webinar.jpg

Qualitative evidence synthesis and evidence implementation

In this #JBI LIVE webinar A/Prof Craig Lockwood discusses: the importance and reasoning for conducting qualitative evidence synthesis; the process of how to do so; and how qualitative synthesis can be formed into meaningful and actionable recommendations for policy and practice change.

(1059)-What-is-EDI-(equity,-diversity,-inclusion)-in-healthcare-thumbnail-640_.jpg

What is EDI (equity, diversity, inclusion) in healthcare?

Prof Catrin Evans breaks down EDI (equity, diversity and inclusion) within the evidence ecosystem.

(1059)-Equity,-Diversity,-Inclusion-in-Qualitative-Systematic-Reviews-thumbnail-640.jpg

Equity, Diversity, Inclusion in Qualitative Systematic Reviews

What is EDI (equity, diversity, inclusion) in healthcare?

Publications

The “quality” of JBI qualitative research synthesis: a methodological investigation into the adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance

Munn,  Z et al, 2021

This methodological review sought to determine the extent to which a selection of meta-aggregative systematic reviews follow the available guidance, with a view to establishing compliance and identifying potential areas for improvement.

  • No labels