<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-Y0S42W4GLW"></script>
<script>
window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
function gtag()

Unknown macro: {dataLayer.push(arguments);}

gtag('js', new Date());

gtag('config', 'G-Y0S42W4GLW');
</script>

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »

This section should include the overall conclusions of the review. The conclusions should provide direct answers to the review objectives/questions. These conclusions should be based only on the results of the review and directly inferred from the review results.

Recommendations for practice

This sub-section of Conclusions section should include the recommendations for practice inferred from the results of the review and inferred also based on the discussion of the generalizability of the results and the potential factors that may affect the applicability of results. It should be stated how the findings of the review impact on clinical practice or policy in the area. Where there is sufficient evidence to make specific recommendations for practice, these should be clearly articulated  Recommendations should be assigned a JBI Grade of Recommendation. 

Recommendations for research

This sub-section should include clear, specific recommendations for future research based on gaps in knowledge identified from the results of the review. Umbrella Review authors may find they are able to make comment both on the future conduct of research syntheses and systematic reviews as well as to provide comment on the primary research conducted in the area of interest.



  • No labels