<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-Y0S42W4GLW"></script>
<script>
window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
function gtag()

Unknown macro: {dataLayer.push(arguments);}

gtag('js', new Date());

gtag('config', 'G-Y0S42W4GLW');
</script>

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Current »

Catalin Tufanaru, Zachary Munn, Edoardo Aromataris, Jared Campbell, Lisa Hopp

How to cite: 

Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L. Systematic reviews of effectiveness (2020). Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2024. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.  https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-03


Contents

Interim Guidance

JBI Methodology Groups are continuously working to improve, update and further the science of JBI Evidence Syntheses. JBI Methodology chapters are updated when there have been significant changes to a methodology, as determined by the JBI Scientific Committee. Interim guidance for steps, sections or stages of a review methodology is often provided via publications ahead of formal chapter updates. Please see below for relevant interim guidance:

The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials

Barker et al 2023

JBI recently began the process of updating and revising its suite of critical appraisal tools to ensure that these tools remain compatible with recent developments within risk of bias science. Following a rigorous development process led by the JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group, this paper presents the revised critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials.

  • No labels