References

Abrams, JA, Tabaac, A, Jung, S & Else-Quest, NM 2020, ‘Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research’, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 258, pp. 113138.

Allen, J & Vottero, B 2020, ‘Experiences of homeless women in accessing health care in community-based settings: a qualitative systematic review’, JBI Evidence Synthesis, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1970–2010.

Aspers, P & Corte, U 2019, ‘What is qualitative in qualitative research’, Qualitative Sociology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 139–160.

Baldwin, S, Malone, M, Sandall, J & Bick, D 2018, ‘Mental health and wellbeing during the transition to fatherhood: a systematic review of first time fathers’ experiences’, JBI Evidence Synthesis, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 2118–2191.

Booth, A, Noyes, J, Flemming, K, Gerhardus, A, Wahlster, P, van der Wilt, GJ, Mozygemba, K, Refolo, P, Sacchini, D, Tummers, M & Rehfuess, E 2018, ‘Structured methodology review identified seven (RETREAT) criteria for selecting qualitative evidence synthesis approaches’, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 99, pp. 41–52.

Booth, A, Noyes, J, Flemming, K, Gerhardus, A, Wahlster, P, van der Wilt, GJ, Mozygemba, K, Refolo, P, Sacchini, D, Tummers, M & Rehfuess, E 2016, ‘Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions’, <http://www.integrate-hta.eu/download/s/>.

Braun, V & Clarke, V 2022, Thematic analysis: a practical guide, SAGE, London.

Braveman, P 2006, ‘Health disparities and health equity: concepts and measurement’, Annual Review of Public Health, vol. 27, pp. 167–194.

Carroll, C & Booth, A 2015, ‘Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed?’, Research Synthesis Methods, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 149–154.

Carter, SM & Little, M 2007 ‘Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1316–1328.

Cotton, A, Sayers, J, Green, H, Magann, L, Paulik, O, Sikhosana, N, Fernandez, R & Foster J 2024, ‘Older persons’ perceptions and experiences of community palliative care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence’, JBI Evidence Synthesis, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 234–272.

Croslley, N 2001, ‘The phenomenological habitus and its construction’, Theory and Society, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 81–120.

Dankel, M & Lambert, M 2023, ‘Abstracts for a wider audience: promoting linguistic diversity in JBI Evidence Synthesis’, JBI Evidence Synthesis, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 833–834.

Davis, K, White, S & Stephenson, M 2016, ‘The influence of workplace culture on nurses’ learning experiences: a systematic review of qualitative evidence’, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 274–346.

Dewidar, O, Kawala, BA, Antequera, A, Tricco, AC, Tovey, D, Straus, S, Glover, R, Tufte, J, Magwood, O, Smith, Ooi, CP, Dion, A, Goetghebeur, M, Reveiz, L, Negrini, S, Tugwell, P, Petkovic, J & Welch, V 2022, ‘Methodological guidance for incorporating equity when informing rapid-policy and guideline development’, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 150, pp. 142–153.

Dörfler, V & Stierand, M 2021, ‘Bracketing: a phenomenological theory applied through transpersonal reflexivity‘, Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 23, pp. 778–793.

Doyle, L, McCabe, C, Keogh, B, Brady, A & McCann, M 2020, ‘An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research’, Journal of Research in Nursing, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 443–455.

Finlay, L 2002, ‘‘Outing’ the researcher: the provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 531–545.

Flemming, K & Noyes, J 2021, ‘Qualitative evidence synthesis: where are we at?‘, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 20, n.p.

France, EF, Cunningham, M, Ring, N, Uny, I, Duncan, EAS, Jepson, RG, Maxwell, M, Roberts, RJ, Turley, RL, Booth, A, Britten, N, Flemming, K, Gallagher, I, Garside, R, Hannes, K, Lewin, S, Noblit, GW, Pope, C, Thomas, J, Vanstone, M, Higginbottom, GMA & Noyes J 2019, ‘Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance’, BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 25.

Garratt, D & Hodkinson, P 1998, ‘Can there be criteria for selecting research criteria? A hermeneutical analysis of an inescapable dilemma’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 515–539.

Glenton, C, Bohren, M, Downe, S, Paulsen, E & Lewin S 2022, ‘EPOC qualitative evidence syntheses: protocol and review template v13’ <https://zenodo.org/records/5973704#.Y48w3nbMI2w >

Graneheim, UH, Lindgren, BM & Lundman, B 2017, ‘Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: a discussion paper’, Nurse Education Today, vol. 56, pp. 29–34.

Greenhalgh, T & Taylor, R 1997, ‘Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research)’, British Medical Journal, vol. 315, no. 7110, pp. 740–743.

Hannes, K & Harden, A 2011, ‘Multi-context versus context-specific qualitative evidence syntheses: combining the best of both’, Research Synthesis Methods, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 271–278.

Hannes, K & Lockwood, C 2011a, Synthesizing qualitative research: choosing the right approach, Wiley, Chichester, UK.

Hannes, K & Lockwood, C 2011b, ‘Pragmatism as the philosophical foundation for the Joanna Briggs meta-aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 1632–1642.

Hannes, K, Lockwood, C & Pearson, A 2010, ‘A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments’ ability to assess validity in qualitative research’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1736–1743.

JBI Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Party. 2014, Supporting document for the JBI levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation. JBI, Adelaide, Australia <https://universityofadelaide.app.box.com/s/09jmummnl0me2fj5rby5ntyin0cmcxfy >

Jordan Z, Pittman P. 2006, A short history of a big idea. Melbourne, The Joanna Briggs Institute, A

Kaushik, V & Walsh, C 2019, ‘Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research‘, Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 9, p. 255.

Kavanaugh, J, Oliver, S & Lorenc, T 2008, Reflections on developing and using PROGRESS-Plus Equity Update, Cochrane Health Equity Field and Campbell Equity Methods Group. <https://methods.cochrane.org/sites/methods.cochrane.org.equity/files/uploads/Equity_Update_Vol2_Issue1.pdf>

Kegley, J 2022, ‘Josiah Royce: a neglected figure and a valuable resource in mining the pragmatism/ phenomenology interactions for current philosophical inquiry’, European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1–15.

Kelly, C, Dansereau, L, Sebring, J, Aubrecht, K, FitzGerald, M, Lee, Y, Williams, A & Hamilton-Hinch, B 2022, ‘Intersectionality, health equity, and EDI: what’s the difference for health researchers?’, International Journal for Equity in Health, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 182.

Kelly, L & Cordeiro, M 2020, ‘Three principles of pragmatism for research on organisational processes’, Methodological Innovations, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–10.

Kim, H, Sefcik, JS & Bradway, C 2017, ‘Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: a systematic review’, Research in Nursing and Health, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 23–42.

Konno, Rie. 2006, Support for overseas qualified nurses in adjusting to Australian nursing practice: a systematic review. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 1-29

Krefting, L 1991, ‘Rigour in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness’, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 214–222.

Lewin, S, Booth, A, Glenton, C, Munthe-Kaas, H, Rashidian, A, Wainwright, M, Bohren, MA, Tunçalp, Ö, Colvin, CJ, Garside, R, Carlsen, B, Langlois, EV & Noyes, J 2018, ‘Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series’, Implementation Science, vol. 13, Supplement 1, p. 2.

Lincoln, G & Guba, E 1985, Naturalistic Inquiryi, SAGE, Beverly Hills, CA.

Lockwood, C, Jordan, Z, Bhatarasakoon, P & Jia, RM 2023, ‘The rise of checklists and the fall of reflexivity in qualitative research’, Nursing and Health Sciences Journal, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 267–270.

Lockwood, C, Munn, Z & Porritt, K 2015, ‘Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation’, JBI Evidence Implementation, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 179–187.

Long, Q & Jiang, H 2023, ‘Qualitative research in health: value and visibility’, Lancet Regional Health. Western Pacific, vol. 34, pp. 100790.

Macdonald, D, Publow, C, Ross-White, A, Aston, M & Snelgrove-Clarke, E 2023, ‘Postpartum experiences of women, birthing people, and their families during COVID-19: a qualitative systematic review protocol’, JBI Evidence Synthesis, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 2446–2454.

Maehara, K, Iwata, H, Kimura, K & Mori, E 2022, ‘Experiences of transition to motherhood among pregnant women following assisted reproductive technology: a qualitative systematic review’, JBI Evidence Synthesis, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 725–760.

Majid, U & Kandasamy, S 2021, ‘The rationales for and challenges with employing arts-based health services research (ABHSR): a qualitative systematic review of primary studies’, Medical Humanities, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 266–273.

Mays, N & Pope, C 2000, ‘Assessing quality in qualitative research’, British Medical Journal, vol. 320, no. 7226, pp. 50–52.

McCloskey, R, Keeping-Burke, L, Morris, P, Witherspoon, R, Knight, H & Cave, S 2023, ‘Nursing students’ experiences of a post-licensure practical nurse bridging program: a qualitative systematic review’, JBI Evidence Synthesis, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1359–1407.

Min, M, Hancock, DG, Aromataris, E, Crotti, T & Boros, C 2022, ‘Experiences of living with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a qualitative systematic review’, JBI Evidence Synthesis, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 60–120.

Moran, D 2011, ‘Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology of habituality and habitus‘, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, vol. 42, pp. 53–77.

Munn, Z, Porritt, K, Lockwood, C, Aromataris, E & Pearson, A 2014, ‘Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach’, BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 14, p. 108.

Munn Z, Aromataris E, Tufanaru C, Stern C, Porritt K, Farrow J, Lockwood C, Stephenson M, Moola S, Lizarondo L, McArthur A, Peters M, Pearson A, Jordan Z. 2019. The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI). International Journal of Evidence Based Healthcare, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 36–43.

Munthe-Kaas, HM, Glenton, C, Booth, A, Noyes, J & Lewin, S 2019, ‘Systematic mapping of existing tools to appraise methodological strengths and limitations of qualitative research: first stage in the development of the CAMELOT tool’, BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 113.

Noblit, G & Hare, D 1988, Meta-ethnography: synthesising qualitative studies, SAGE.

Norberg, A, Nelson, J, Holly, C, Jewell, ST, Lieggi, M & Salmond, S 2019, ‘Experiences of HIV-infected adults and healthcare providers with healthcare delivery practices that influence engagement in US primary healthcare settings: a qualitative systematic review’, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1154–1228.

Noyes, J, Booth, A, Moore, G, Flemming, K, Tunçalp, Ö & Shakibazadeh, E 2019, ‘Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods’, BMJ Global Health, vol. 4, Supplement 1, e000893.

O’Neill, J, Tabish, H, Welch, V, Petticrew, M, Pottie, K, Clarke, M, Evans, T, Pardo Pardo, J, Waters, E White, H & Tugwell, P 2014 ‘Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health’, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 56–64.

Paradis-Gagné, E & Pariseau-Legault, P 2022, ‘Critical research and qualitative methodologies: theoretical foundations and contribution to nursing research’, Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 119–138.

Pearson A, 2004, ‘Balancing the evidence: incorporating the synthesis of qualitative data into systematic reviews’,  JBI Reports, vol. 2, pp. 45-64.

Pearson A, Porritt KA, Doran D, Vincent L, Craig D, Tucker D, Long L, Henstridge V, 2006, ‘A comprehensive systematic review of evidence on the structure, process, characteristics and composition of a nursing team that fosters a healthy work environment’, JBI Library Systemaic Reviews, vol. 2, pp.1-69.

Pollock, A, Campbell, P, Struthers, C, Synnot, A, Nunn, J, Hill, S, Goodare, H, Morris, J, Watts, C & Morley, R 2019, ‘Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews’, Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 245–255.

Porritt, K, Gomersall, J & Lockwood, C 2014, ‘JBI’s systematic reviews: study selection and critical appraisal’, American Journal of Nursing, vol. 114, no. 6, pp. 47–52.

Rankl, F, Johnson, GA & Vindrola-Padros, C 2021, ‘Examining what we know in relation to how we know it: a team-based reflexivity model for rapid qualitative health research’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1358–1370.

Renjith, V, Yesodharan, R, Noronha, JA, Ladd, E & George, A 2021, ‘Qualitative methods in health care research’, International Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 12, p. 20.

Ruzycki, SM & Ahmed, SB 2022, ‘Equity, diversity and inclusion are foundational research skills’, Nature Human Behavavior, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 910–912.

Sandelowski, M & Barroso, J 2002, ‘Reading qualitative studies’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 74–108.

Sandelowski, M, Barroso, J & Voils CI 2007, ‘Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings’, Research in Nursing & Health, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 99–111.

Sattar, R, Lawton, R, Panagioti, M & Johnson, J 2021, ‘Meta-ethnography in healthcare research: a guide to using a meta-ethnographic approach for literature synthesis’, BMC Health Services Research, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 50.

Small, SP, Maddigan, J, Swab, M & Jarvis, K 2023, ‘Pregnant and postnatal women’s experiences of interacting with health care providers about their tobacco smoking: a qualitative systematic review’, JBI Evidence Synthesis, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1066–1189.

Tanywe, AC, Green, H & Fernandez, R 2022, ‘Perceptions and practices of community members relating to trachoma in Africa: a qualitative systematic review’, JBI Evidence Synthesis, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 2445–2474.

Thomas, J & Harden, A 2008 ‘Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews’, BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 8, p. 45.

Tugwell, P, Petticrew, M, Kristjansson, E, Welch, V, Ueffing, E, Waters, E, Bonnefoy, J, Morgan, A, Doohan, V & Kelly, MP 2010, ‘Assessing equity in systematic reviews: realising the recommendations of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health’, British Medical Journal, vol. 341, c4739.

Walsh, R 2003, ‘The methods of reflexivity’, The Humanistic Psychologist, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 51–66.

Welch, VA, Petticrew, M, O’Neill, J, Waters, E, Armstrong, R, Bhutta, ZA, Francis, D, Koehlmoos, TP, Kristjansson, E, Pantoja, T & Tugwell, P 2013 ‘Health equity: evidence synthesis and knowledge translation methods’, Systematic Reviews, vol. 2, p. 43.

Williams, V, Boylan, AM & Nunan, D 2019, ‘Qualitative research as evidence: expanding the paradigm for evidence–based healthcare’, BMJ Evididence-based Medicine, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 168–169.

Woodgate, RL, Tennent, P, Barriage, S & Legras, N 2020, ‘The lived experience of anxiety and the many facets of pain: a qualitative, arts-based approach’, Canadian Journal of Pain, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 6–18.