Versions Compared
Version | Old Version 2 | New Version Current |
---|---|---|
Changes made by | ||
Saved on |
Key
- This line was added.
- This line was removed.
- Formatting was changed.
Anderson, D. B., Mathieson, S., Eyles, J., Maher, C. G., Van Gelder, J. M., Tomkins-Lane, C. C., . . . Ferreira, M. L. (2019). Measurement properties of walking outcome measures for neurogenic claudication: a systematic review and meta analysis. Spine J. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.004
Aromataris, E., & Pearson, A. (2014). The systematic review: an overview. Am J Nurs, 114(3), 53-58. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000444496.24228.2c
Bai, Z., Shu, T., Lu, J., & Niu, W. (2018). Measurement Properties of the Functional Rating Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 43(22), E1340-E1349. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002690
Chamorro, C., Armijo-Olivo, S., De la Fuente, C., Fuentes, J., & Javier Chirosa, L. (2017). Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand Held Dynamometry and Isokinetic Dynamometry in the Hip, Knee and Ankle Joint: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Open Med (Wars), 12, 359-375. doi: 10.1515/med-2017-0052
Chiarotto, A., Maxwell, L. J., Terwee, C. B., Wells, G. A., Tugwell, P., & Ostelo, R. W. (2016). Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index: Which Has Better Measurement Properties for Measuring Physical Functioning in Nonspecific Low Back Pain? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther, 96(10), 1620-1637. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150420
Collins, N. J., Prinsen, C. A., Christensen, R., Bartels, E. M., Terwee, C. B., & Roos, E. M. (2016). Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 24(8), 1317-1329. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.010
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials, 7(3), 177-188.
Francis, O. D., McPheeters, M. L., Noud, M., Penson, D. F., & Feurer, I. D. (2016). Checklist to operationalize measurement characteristics of patient- reported outcome measures. BMC Systematic Reviews, 5(129), 1-11. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0307-4
Gewitz, M. H., Baltimore, R. S., Tani, L. Y., Sable, C. A., Shulman, S. T., Carapetis, J., . . . Kaplan, E. L. (2015). Revision of the Jones Criteria for the Diagnosis of Acute Rheumatic Fever in the Era of Doppler Echocardiography. Circulation, 131(20), 1806-1818. doi: org/10.1161/CIR.
0000000000000205
Ginty, A. T. (2013). Psychometric Properties. In M. D. Gellman & J. R. Turner (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine (pp. 1563-1564). New
York, NY: Springer New York.
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res, 35(6), 382-385.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). The PRISMA Group Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses:
The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 6(7), 1-6. Retrieved from doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
Mokkink, L. B., de Vet, H. C. W., Prinsen, C. A. C., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., & Terwee, C. B. (2018a). COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Qual Life Res, 27(5), 1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A. C., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2018b). COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Retrieved from http://www.cosmin.nl
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., . . . de Vet, H. C. (2010a). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol, 63(7), 737-745. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., . . . de Vet, H. C. W. (2010b). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539-549. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A. C., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2016). Taxonomy of measurement properties: A commentary on Polit (2015). International Journal of Nursing Studies, 53, 399-400. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.08.010
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., Riphagen, I., . . . de Vet, H. C. (2009). Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 18(3), 313-333. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9451-9
Munn, Z. (2015). Implications for Practice: should recommendations be recommended in systematic reviews? JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 13(7), 1-3.
Polit, D. F. (2015). Assessing measurement in health: Beyond reliability and validity. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(11), 1746-1753. doi: h ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.07.002
Polit, D. F. (2016). Taxonomy of measurement properties: A response to the commentary by Mokkink et al. (2015). International Journal of Nursing Studies, 53, 401-402. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.10.009
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. (2014). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (8 ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Polit, D. F., & Yang, F. (2016). Measurement and the measurement of change: A primer for health professionals. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Porritt, K., Gomersall, J., & Lockwood, C. (2014). JBI's Systematic Reviews: Study selection and critical appraisal. Am J Nurs, 114(6), 47-52. doi: 10.1097/01.Naj.0000450430.97383.64
Prinsen, C. A. C., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., de Vet, H. C. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res, 27(5), 1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
Rosenkoetter, U., & Tate, R. L. (2017). Assessing Features of Psychometric Assessment Instruments: A Comparison of the COSMIN Checklist with Other Critical Appraisal Tools. Brain Impairment, 19(1), 103-118. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2017.29
Schünemann, H., Broek, J., Guyatt, G., & Oxman, A., (editors). (2013). GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Updated October 2013.
Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect size The handbook of research synthesis. (pp. 261-281). New York, NY, US: Russell Sage Foundation.
Streiner, D. L. (2003). Clinimetrics vs. psychometrics: an unnecessary distinction. J Clin Epidemiol, 56(12), 1142-1145; discussion 1146-1149.
Terwee, C., Prinsen, C., Garotti, M. R., Suman, A., De Vet, H., & Mokkink, L. (2016a). The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 25(4), 767-779.
Terwee, C. B., de Vet, H. C. W., Prinsen, C. A. C., & Mokkink, L. B. (2016b). Comment on “Checklist to operationalize measurement characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures”. Retrieved 16 Apr, 2017, from http://www.cosmin.nl/images/upload/files/Letter%20Francis.pdf
Terwee, C. B., Jansma, E. P., Riphagen, I. I., & de Vet, H. C. (2009). Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 18(8), 1115-1123.
Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L., Ostelo, R. W., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2012). Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 651-657. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011- 9960-1
Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A. C., Chiarotto, A., Westerman, M. J., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., . . . Mokkink, L. B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res, 27(5), 1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829- 0
University of Oxford. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Group. Retrieved Accessed 15 October 2018, from http://phi.uhce.ox.ac.uk/home.php
Whalen, K., & Buchholz, S. W. (2009). The reliability, validity and feasibility of tools used to screen for caregiver burden: a systematic review. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews, 7(32), 1373-1430.